Research finding · January 2025
Three different methods of suicide prevention education impacted pharmacists’ learning outcomes
Pharmacy staff are in a unique position to play a pivotal role in suicide prevention, as they frequently interact with patients who may be experiencing suicidal thoughts or behaviors. Given the accessibility and trust patients often place in their pharmacists, these healthcare professionals can act as key figures in early identification and intervention. Programs like Pharm-SAVES aim to equip pharmacy professionals with the necessary skills to identify and assist at-risk individuals, thereby expanding the reach of suicide prevention efforts within communities.
With her AFSP-funded grant, Dr. Delesha Carpenter aimed to evaluate different methods for training pharmacy staff in suicide prevention and determine their impact on learning outcomes. She compared written patient cases, prerecorded simulated patients (SPs), and live SPs to assess how each format influenced participants’ ability to identify suicide risk and take appropriate action. Dr. Carpenter found that while participants asked about suicide consistently across all evaluation methods, live SP interactions led to a higher frequency of referrals to the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline (988). Furthermore, live SPs facilitated more effective recognition and response to patient emotions. While prerecorded SPs and written cases offer cost-effective alternatives, live SPs were found to provide a more realistic environment for practicing the communication skills essential to suicide prevention. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating live simulations in training programs to develop the nuanced, empathetic skills necessary for addressing suicide risk in a community setting.
Citation: Marley, G., Lavigne, J. E., Cross, W., Gamble, A., Zhang, Z., & Carpenter, D. M. (2024). Comparing three methods to assess learning outcomes for a suicide prevention training program for pharmacy staff. PEC innovation, 5, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100348
This finding comes from an AFSP-funded study — see the grant below ↓