Research finding · June 2025
Moment-to-moment research methods can be used ethically to study suicide
Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a common and serious behavior, linked to later suicidal thoughts and behaviors. Traditional methods of studying NSSI — such as surveys and interviews — often miss the rapid and fluctuating nature of these behaviors. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA), which uses real-time data collection through smartphone-based prompts, offers a promising alternative. However, EMA studies introduce new ethical challenges, including how researchers should respond to moments of high risk, protect participant autonomy, and ensure safety without interfering with the behavior being studied. As EMA use grows in mental health research, clearer guidance is needed to navigate these dilemmas responsibly.
Citing her AFSP-funded work, Dr. Sarah Victor reviewed current practices and proposes ethics-based recommendations for conducting EMA research on NSSI. The authors discuss how to design studies that avoid stigmatizing language, safeguard participant well-being, and manage risk appropriately – balancing participant safety with the goal of gathering authentic, real-time data. They emphasize the importance of informed consent, diverse participant inclusion, and clear crisis response protocols tailored to the level of risk. The paper calls for further research to establish empirically grounded best practices and highlights the need for ongoing collaboration with individuals who have lived experience of NSSI to shape future study design and ethics.
Citation: Hoelscher, E. C., Victor, S. E., Kiekens, G., & Ammerman, B. (2025). Ethical considerations for the use of ecological momentary assessment in non-suicidal self-injury research. Ethics & Behavior, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2025.2456714
This finding comes from an AFSP-funded study — see the grant below ↓